It’s the same with Rosetta Stone and your new language. When you were a toddler just starting to learn English, you didn’t have a mother language to fall back on as you learned- you were forced to learn English. Rosetta Stone purposefully tries to imitate the natural learning process as closely as possible. You’ll notice throughout your course that there is very little use of English directions and translations- and this is deliberate. One other reason that I really like Rosetta Stone is that it relies on the concept of immersion. To be fair, some of the LingoDeer drills and exercises incorporate visuals as well, but it’s far less frequent as compared to Rosetta Stone. Rosetta Stone is great for visual learners It’s the program for visual learners in my mind. Therefore, if you’re the type of person who learns best through associating new words and phrases with images and pictures, then Rosetta Stone should be right up your alley. Plus, Rosetta Stone also offers a library of on-demand videos. You’re constantly matching images to spoken or written phrases, and even the speaking-based drills are built on visuals. Nearly every single one of the Rosetta Stone practice exercises include images. Great Fit For Visual LearnersĪnother important advantage for Rosetta Stone is that it’s tailor made for visual learners. So bottom line, I give the win to Rosetta Stone when it comes to speaking exercises and getting feedback on your pronunciation. Plus, their system seems to have some issues with numbers as well. Sometimes it would take me several attempts to get their software to accept my answer, even though I knew I was pronouncing the word or phrase correctly. In contrast, LingoDeer’s software sometimes gave me some issues during verbal practice exercises. It’s quick, accurate, and very user-friendly. It’s right up there with Rocket Languages, Pimsleur and Babbel. Now, right off the bat, it’s important to note that no speech recognition software is perfect (at least, I am yet to find one that is), so conversing with or getting feedback from actual fluent speakers is always preferred.īut as far as automating the process goes, I have to admit that Rosetta Stone’s tech is one of the best speech tools I’ve tested. ![]() ![]() The first reason to use Rosetta Stone is the company’s TruAccent speech recognition technology. And let’s start with the reasons to use Rosetta Stone over LingoDeer. ![]() Next, let’s cover the major reasons to choose each program over the other-or in other words, where each app has unique advantages. Why Rosetta Stone Is Better Than LingoDeer Not huge amounts, but maybe enough to make a difference. You’ll likely save around $5 per month by going with them, and $120 if you want a lifetime plan. Thus, stepping back and comparing the two apps, Rosetta Stone is the more affordable option. Though their full retail MSRP is generally priced a little higher on the website, you can almost always find the 3-month plan for $36, the 12-month plan for $96, and the lifetime plan (which includes access to all Rosetta Stone languages) for around $180. Rosetta Stone, on the other hand, offers just three different subscription plans: a 3-month subscription, a 12-month subscription, and a lifetime plan. In order to access the full version of LingoDeer, you have to upgrade to their Premium plan, which costs $15 per month (if you subscribe on a month-by-month basis), $40 for three months, $160 for 12 months, or $300 for a lifetime subscription. In my opinion, it’s much more like a free trial than a real plan. Though LingoDeer actually offers a free plan, as you might imagine, it’s pretty limited. ![]() To begin, let’s briefly discuss pricing between these two programs. Claim Discount Pricing & Subscription Options
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |